Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

State v. Freeman

State v. Freeman
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 15, 2010 · Accept, Appeal, Cupp, Donnell, Dunlap, Hold, Law, Pfeifer, Proposition, Stratton
127 Ohio St. 3d 1460; 938 N.E.2d 363

State v. Freeman

Opinion of the Court

Cuyahoga App. No. 92809, 2010-Ohio-3714. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I, and briefing shall proceed as to Proposition of Law No. I.

O’Donnell and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. IV; cause held as to that proposition of law for the decision in 2009-1997, State v. Hodge, Hamilton App. No. C-080968; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. VI; cause held as to that proposition of law for the decision in 2009-0477, State v. Dunlap, Cuyahoga App. No. 91165, 2009-Ohio-134; and briefing schedule stayed.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. V and hold the cause for the decision in 2009-0477, State v. Dunlap. Pfeifer, J., dissents as to Proposition of Law No. VT.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.