Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

State v. Freeman

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 15, 2010 · Accept, Appeal, Cupp, Donnell, Dunlap, Hold, Law, Pfeifer, Proposition, Stratton

127 Ohio St. 3d 1460; 938 N.E.2d 363

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Quisi Bryan v. David Bobby (6th Cir. 2016)
Bryan v. Bobby (District Court, N.D. Ohio 2015)
E. Liverpool v. Buckeye Water Dist. (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
State v. Adkins (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Cuyahoga App. No. 92809, 2010-Ohio-3714. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I, and briefing shall proceed as to Proposition of Law No. I.

O’Donnell and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. IV; cause held as to that proposition of law for the decision in 2009-1997, State v. Hodge, Hamilton App. No. C-080968; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. VI; cause held as to that proposition of law for the decision in 2009-0477, State v. Dunlap, Cuyahoga App. No. 91165, 2009-Ohio-134; and briefing schedule stayed.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. V and hold the cause for the decision in 2009-0477, State v. Dunlap. Pfeifer, J., dissents as to Proposition of Law No. VT.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.