Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

Reywal Co. v. City of Dublin

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 9, 2010 · Accept, Appeal, Brown, Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Pfeifer, Stratton, Would

128 Ohio St. 3d 270

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Rewyal Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Dublin (Ohio Ct. App. 2017)
Reywal Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Dublin (Ohio 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed in judgment only on the authority of Campbell v. Carlisle, 127 Ohio St.3d 275, 2010-Ohio-5707, 939 N.E.2d 153, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for application of Campbell v. Carlisle.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer and Cupp, JJ., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.