Ohio Supreme Court, 2011

Disciplinary Counsel v. Robinson

Disciplinary Counsel v. Robinson
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided October 20, 2011 · Brown, Cupp, Lanzinger, Lundberg, McGee, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Pfeifer, Stratton
2011 Ohio 5409; 130 Ohio St. 3d 1210

Disciplinary Counsel v. Robinson

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, David Jerome Robinson, Attorney Registration No. 0059369, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 25, 2010, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Robinson, 126 Ohio St.3d 371, 2010-Ohio-3829, 933 N.E.2d 1095.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.