McDougald v. Brunsman
Ohio Supreme Court
McDougald v. Brunsman, 2011 Ohio 4607 (Ohio 2011)
130 Ohio St. 3d 22
O'Connor, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, Brown
McDougald v. Brunsman
Opinion
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Jerone McDougald, for a writ of habeas corpus. His claims are not cognizable in habeas corpus. See Pishok v. Kelly, 122 Ohio St.3d 292, 2009-Ohio-3452, 910 N.E.2d 1033 (validity or sufficiency of charging instrument); Junius v. Eberlin, 122 Ohio St.3d 53, 2009-Ohio-2383, 907 N.E.2d 1179 (actual innocence); Keith v. Bobby, 117 Ohio St.3d 470, 2008-Ohio-1443, 884 N.E.2d 1067, ¶ 15 (fraud upon the court, prosecutorial misconduct, and perjured testimony).
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- McDougald, Appellant, v. Brunsman, Warden, Appellee
- Status
- Published