McDougald v. Brunsman

Ohio Supreme Court
McDougald v. Brunsman, 2011 Ohio 4607 (Ohio 2011)
130 Ohio St. 3d 22
O'Connor, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, Brown

McDougald v. Brunsman

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Jerone McDougald, for a writ of habeas corpus. His claims are not cognizable in habeas corpus. See Pishok v. Kelly, 122 Ohio St.3d 292, 2009-Ohio-3452, 910 N.E.2d 1033 (validity or sufficiency of charging instrument); Junius v. Eberlin, 122 Ohio St.3d 53, 2009-Ohio-2383, 907 N.E.2d 1179 (actual innocence); Keith v. Bobby, 117 Ohio St.3d 470, 2008-Ohio-1443, 884 N.E.2d 1067, ¶ 15 (fraud upon the court, prosecutorial misconduct, and perjured testimony).

Judgment affirmed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
McDougald, Appellant, v. Brunsman, Warden, Appellee
Status
Published