State v. Cherif

Ohio Supreme Court March 8, 2011

State v. Cherif, 2011 Ohio 956 (Ohio 2011)

128 Ohio St. 3d 356

Pfeifer, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, O'Connor, Stratton, Brown

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

{¶ 2} The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals addressing appellant’s second assignment of error below is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton and McGee Brown, JJ., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

Reference

Full Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Cherif, Appellant
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published