State v. McClendon

Ohio Supreme Court March 8, 2011

State v. McClendon, 2011 Ohio 954 (Ohio 2011)

128 Ohio St. 3d 354

O'Connor, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Donnell, Cupp, Lanzinger, Brown

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is not accepted.

{¶ 2} The discretionary cross-appeal is accepted.

{¶ 3} The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals addressing appellant’s second assignment of error below is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is *355 remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.

Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Carley J. Ingram, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee and cross-appellant. Kyle McClendon, pro se. O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger and McGee Brown, JJ., dissent and would not accept the cross-appeal.

Reference

Full Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. McClendon, Appellant and Cross-Appellee
Cited By: 7 cases
Status: Published