State v. Roy

Ohio Supreme Court February 10, 2011

State v. Roy, 2011 Ohio 544 (Ohio 2011)

128 Ohio St. 3d 340

O'Connor, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, Brown

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals addressing appellant’s sixth assignment of error below is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Roy, Appellant
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published