Ohio Supreme Court, 2011

State v. Roy

State v. Roy
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 10, 2011 · O'Connor, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, Brown
2011 Ohio 544; 128 Ohio St. 3d 340

State v. Roy

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals addressing appellant’s sixth assignment of error below is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.