Ohio Supreme Court, 2011

Disciplinary Counsel v. Large

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 10, 2011 · O'Connor, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, Brown

2011 Ohio 1081; 128 Ohio St. 3d 1202

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Manore (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2019)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, John Harold Large, Attorney Registration No. 0068732, last known business address in Warren, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of May 6, 2009, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Large, 122 Ohio St.3d 35, 2009-Ohio-2022, 907 N.E.2d 1162.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.