Goins v. Pineda

Ohio Supreme Court
Goins v. Pineda, 2011 Ohio 529 (Ohio 2011)
128 Ohio St. 3d 358
O'Connor, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, Brown

Goins v. Pineda

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the motion of appellant, Dana Goins, for leave to file a second petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Res judicata bars Goins from filing a successive habeas corpus petition to raise claims that he raised or could have raised in his previous petition. See State ex rel. Johnson v. Pineda, 126 Ohio St.3d 480, 2010-Ohio-4387, 935 N.E.2d 38, ¶ 1. 1

Judgment affirmed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
1

. We deny appellant’s motion for oral argument.

Reference

Full Case Name
Goins, Appellant, v. Pineda, Warden, Appellee
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published