Ohio Supreme Court, 2011

Goins v. Pineda

Goins v. Pineda
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 9, 2011 · O'Connor, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, Brown
2011 Ohio 529; 128 Ohio St. 3d 358

Goins v. Pineda

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the motion of appellant, Dana Goins, for leave to file a second petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Res judicata bars Goins from filing a successive habeas corpus petition to raise claims that he raised or could have raised in his previous petition. See State ex rel. Johnson v. Pineda, 126 Ohio St.3d 480, 2010-Ohio-4387, 935 N.E.2d 38, ¶ 1. 1

Judgment affirmed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
1

. We deny appellant’s motion for oral argument.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.