Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2011

Sanderbeck v. Medina Cty.

Sanderbeck v. Medina Cty.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 19, 2011 · Accept, Appeal, Brown, Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Law, Pfeifer, Proposition, Stratton
127 Ohio St. 3d 1502; 939 N.E.2d 1266

Sanderbeck v. Medina Cty.

Opinion of the Court

Medina App. No. 09CA0051-M, 2010-Ohio-3659. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

*1503Discretionary cross-appeal not accepted.

O’Connor, C.J., and McGee Brown, J., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑