Havel v. Villa St. Joseph
Havel v. Villa St. Joseph
127 Ohio St. 3d 1530; 940 N.E.2d 985
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Luri v. Republic Services, Inc. (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)
- Fleenor v. Karr (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Cuyahoga App. No. 94677, 2010-Ohio-5251. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed November 22, 2010:
“Whether R.C. 2315.21(B), as amended by S.B. 80, effective April 7, 2005, is unconstitutional, in violation of Section 5(B), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, because it is a procedural law that conflicts with Civ.R. 42(B).”
The conflict case is Hanners v. Ho Wah Gentling Wire & Cable, Franklin App. No. 09AP-361, 2009-Ohio-6481.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.