Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2011

Essman v. Portsmouth

Essman v. Portsmouth
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 16, 2011 · Accept, Appeal, Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Law, Only, Pfeifer, Proposition
127 Ohio St. 3d 1545; 941 N.E.2d 803

Essman v. Portsmouth

Opinion of the Court

Scioto App. No. 09CA3325, 2010-Ohio-4837. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II, and cause consolidated with 2010-2253, Essman v. Portsmouth, Scioto App. No. 09CA3325, 2010-Ohio-4837.

O’Connor, C.J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II only. *1546Cupp, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I only. Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑