U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Duvall
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Schwartzwald (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)
- Washington Mutual Bank, FA v. Wallace (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Cuyahoga App. No. 94174, 2010-Ohio-6478. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed January 31, 2011:
“To have standing as a plaintiff in a mortgage foreclosure action, must a party show that it owned the note and the mortgage when the complaint was filed?”
The conflict eases are U.S. Bank, N.A v. Bayless, Delaware App. No. 09 CAE 01 004, 2009-Ohio-6115, U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Marcino, 181 Ohio App.3d 328, 2009-Ohio-1178, Bank of New York v. Stuart, Lorain App. No. 06CA008953, 2007-Ohio-1483, and Countrywide Home Loan Servicing, L.P. v. Thomas, Franklin App. No. 09AP-819, 2010-Ohio-3018.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.