Ohio Supreme Court, 2011

State v. Morris

State v. Morris
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 6, 2011 · Brown, Cupp, Donnell, Grant, Lanzinger, Law, Motion, Pfeifer, Proposition, Stratton
128 Ohio St. 3d 1448; 944 N.E.2d 697
State v. Morris

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Medina App. No. 09CA0022-M, 2010-Ohio-4282. Reported at 127 Ohio St.3d 1533, 2011-Ohio-376, 940 N.E.2d 986. On motion for reconsideration. The motion is granted to the following extent: The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and McGee Brown, JJ., would also grant the motion as to Proposition of Law No. II. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.