Ohio Supreme Court, 2011

State ex rel. Vindicator Printing Co. v. Wolff

State ex rel. Vindicator Printing Co. v. Wolff
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 20, 2011
128 Ohio St. 3d 1496; 947 N.E.2d 680

State ex rel. Vindicator Printing Co. v. Wolff

Opinion of the Court

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition.

Upon review of the joint submission of evidence, it is evident that Cynthia Reed Eddy has not filed a timely motion for admission pro hac vice pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. 1.2. Therefore, it is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that Cynthia Reed Eddy is stricken from the evidence for failure to comply with S.Ct-Prac.R. 1.2 and Gov.Bar R. XII(2)(A)(6)(a)-(e). It is further ordered that she is prohibited from participating in or appearing on any future filings in this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.