Ohio Supreme Court, 2011

AT&T Communications v. Lynch

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 22, 2011 · Accept, Appeal, Brown, Cross, Cupp, Donnell, Law, Pfeifer, Proposition, Stratton, Would

128 Ohio St. 3d 1556; 949 N.E.2d 43

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. v. Lynch (Ohio 2012)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Cuyahoga App. No. 94320, 2011-Ohio-302. Discretionary appeal accepted. Discretionary cross-appeal not accepted.

Pfeifer, J., would also accept the cross-appeal. McGee Brown, J., would also accept the cross-appeal on Proposition of Law No. I. Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., dissent and would not accept the appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.