Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Burlingame v. Estate of Burlingame

Ohio Supreme Court
Burlingame v. Estate of Burlingame, 2012 Ohio 5698 (Ohio 2012)
134 Ohio St. 3d 490; 983 N.E.2d 1252
O'Connor, Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, Brown, Pfeifer

Burlingame v. Estate of Burlingame

Opinion

{¶ 1} Sua sponte, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Anderson v. Massillon, 134 Ohio St.3d 380, 2012-Ohio-5711, 983 N.E.2d 266, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion in Anderson v. Massillon.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. *491 Landskroner, Grieco & Merriman, L.L.C., and Drew Legando, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Association for Justice. Murray & Murray Co., L.P.A., and John T. Murray, urging affirmance for amici curiae John Huffman and Olivia Duty.

Reference

Full Case Name
Burlingame, Appellee, v. Estate of Burlingame Et Al., Appellees; Coombs Et Al., Appellants
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published
↑