Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2012

Burlingame v. Estate of Burlingame

Burlingame v. Estate of Burlingame
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 6, 2012 · O'Connor, Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, Brown, Pfeifer
2012 Ohio 5698; 134 Ohio St. 3d 490; 983 N.E.2d 1252

Burlingame v. Estate of Burlingame

Opinion

{¶ 1} Sua sponte, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Anderson v. Massillon, 134 Ohio St.3d 380, 2012-Ohio-5711, 983 N.E.2d 266, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion in Anderson v. Massillon.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. *491 Landskroner, Grieco & Merriman, L.L.C., and Drew Legando, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Association for Justice. Murray & Murray Co., L.P.A., and John T. Murray, urging affirmance for amici curiae John Huffman and Olivia Duty.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑