Ohio Supreme Court, 2012

Burlingame v. Estate of Burlingame

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 6, 2012 · O'Connor, Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, Brown, Pfeifer

2012 Ohio 5698; 134 Ohio St. 3d 490; 983 N.E.2d 1252

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Toros v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Dev. Disabilities (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
Burlingame v. Estate of Burlingame (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
State v. Billman (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

{¶ 1} Sua sponte, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Anderson v. Massillon, 134 Ohio St.3d 380, 2012-Ohio-5711, 983 N.E.2d 266, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion in Anderson v. Massillon.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. *491 Landskroner, Grieco & Merriman, L.L.C., and Drew Legando, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Association for Justice. Murray & Murray Co., L.P.A., and John T. Murray, urging affirmance for amici curiae John Huffman and Olivia Duty.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.