State ex rel. Bevins v. Johnson
Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Bevins v. Johnson, 2012 Ohio 3922 (Ohio 2012)
133 Ohio St. 3d 80
O'Connor, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, Brown
State ex rel. Bevins v. Johnson
Opinion
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Andrew Bevins Jr., for a writ of habeas corpus. Bevins’s claims are not cognizable in habeas corpus. Boles v. Knob, 130 Ohio St.3d 339, 2011-Ohio-5049, 958 N.E.2d 554, ¶ 1 (speedy trial); Thomas v. Huffman, 84 Ohio St.3d 266, 267, 703 N.E.2d 315 (1998) (equal protection); Bellman v. Jago, 38 Ohio St.3d 55, 55-56, 526 N.E.2d 308 (1988) (due process). Bevins had an adequate remedy by appeal to raise his claims.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The State Ex Rel. Bevins, Appellant, v. Johnson, Warden, Appellee
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published