State ex rel. Barr v. Sutula

Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Barr v. Sutula, 2012 Ohio 2790 (Ohio 2012)
132 Ohio St. 3d 297
O'Connor, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, Brown

State ex rel. Barr v. Sutula

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Harry M. Barr, for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Judge John D. Sutula, to correct his sentencing entry to reflect the sentence specified at the court’s “verdict hearing.” Barr had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from his sentencing entry to raise his claim of sentencing error. See State ex rel. Hudson v. Sutula, 131 Ohio St.3d 177, 2012-Ohio-554, 962 N.E.2d 798, ¶ 1; R.C. 2731.05.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State Ex Rel. Barr, Appellant, v. Sutula, Judge, Appellee
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published