Ohio Supreme Court, 2012

State ex rel. Barr v. Sutula

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 26, 2012 · O'Connor, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, Brown

2012 Ohio 2790; 132 Ohio St. 3d 297

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Lenard v. Russo (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
State ex rel. Samples v. Heath (Ohio 2013)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Harry M. Barr, for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Judge John D. Sutula, to correct his sentencing entry to reflect the sentence specified at the court’s “verdict hearing.” Barr had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from his sentencing entry to raise his claim of sentencing error. See State ex rel. Hudson v. Sutula, 131 Ohio St.3d 177, 2012-Ohio-554, 962 N.E.2d 798, ¶ 1; R.C. 2731.05.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.