State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Allen
State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Allen
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Allen, 132 Ohio St.3d 126, 2012-Ohio-2571.]
THE STATE EX REL. CINCINNATI ENQUIRER v. ALLEN, JUDGE. [Cite as State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Allen, 132 Ohio St.3d 126, 2012-Ohio-2571.]
Cause dismissed based on mootness. (No. 2011-1643—Submitted May 22, 2012—Decided June 13, 2012.)
IN MANDAMUS. __________________ {¶ 1} Upon consideration of the parties’ evidence and briefs, this cause is dismissed based on mootness.
O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Graydon Head & Ritchey, L.L.P., and John C. Greiner, for relators.
Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Christian J.
Schaefer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent. ______________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.