Ohio Supreme Court, 2012

Goodman v. Hanseman

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 12, 2012 · Brown, Cupp, Lanzinger, Lundberg, McGee, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Pfeifer, Stratton

2012 Ohio 1587; 132 Ohio St. 3d 23

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

In re E.E.D. (Ohio Ct. App. 2022)
In re D.D. (Ohio Ct. App. 2026)
In re D.K. (Ohio Ct. App. 2024)
In re AN.M. (Ohio Ct. App. 2022)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} To have appellate standing, a party must be “ ‘aggrieved by the final order appealed from.’ ” State ex rel. Merrill v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, 130 Ohio St.3d 30, 2011-Ohio-4612, 955 N.E.2d 935, ¶ 28, quoting Ohio Contract Carriers Assn., Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm., 140 Ohio St. 160, 42 N.E.2d 758 (1942), syllabus. Accord State ex rel. Gabriel v. Youngstown, 75 Ohio St.3d 618, 665 N.E.2d 209 (1996). Appellees, the cross-appellants below, did not have standing to appeal the decision of the trial court. Accordingly, the portion of the court of appeals decision concerning the powers of the Division of Securities is vacated.

So ordered.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.