Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

State v. McAlmont

Ohio Supreme Court
State v. McAlmont, 133 Ohio St. 3d 162 (Ohio 2012)
976 N.E.2d 898
Brown, Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Gunnell, Lanzinger, Ohio, Pfeifer, Stated, Stratton

State v. McAlmont

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Gunnell, 132 Ohio St.3d 442, 2012-Ohio-3236, 973 N.E.2d 243.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. D. Andrew Wilson, Clark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Andrew Picek, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Murr, Compton, Claypool & Macbeth and Charles M. Blue, for appellee. Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in State v. Gunnell, 132 Ohio St.3d 442, 2012-Ohio-3236, 973 N.E.2d 243.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State of Ohio v. McAlmont
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published
↑