Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2012

State v. McAlmont

State v. McAlmont
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 27, 2012 · Brown, Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Gunnell, Lanzinger, Ohio, Pfeifer, Stated, Stratton
133 Ohio St. 3d 162; 976 N.E.2d 898

State v. McAlmont

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Gunnell, 132 Ohio St.3d 442, 2012-Ohio-3236, 973 N.E.2d 243.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. D. Andrew Wilson, Clark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Andrew Picek, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Murr, Compton, Claypool & Macbeth and Charles M. Blue, for appellee. Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in State v. Gunnell, 132 Ohio St.3d 442, 2012-Ohio-3236, 973 N.E.2d 243.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑