Ohio Supreme Court, 2013

In re Harter

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 17, 2013 · O'Connor, Pfeifer, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, O'Neill

2013 Ohio 5486; 137 Ohio St. 3d 1260; 2 N.E.3d 265

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Harter. (Ohio 2018)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

{¶ 1} On. December 9, 2013, this court suspended respondent, Brian Wade Harter, for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4). On December 12, 2013, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline submitted a notice pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1)(c) notifying this court that respondent no longer was in default of the child-support order previously submitted to the court.

{¶ 2} On consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1), respondent, Brian Wade Harter, Attorney Registration No. 0055500, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio, be reinstated to the practice of law.

{¶ 3} It is further ordered that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(2), reinstatement of respondent shall not terminate any pending disciplinary proceedings against respondent.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.