State ex rel. Ullmann v. JobsOhio

Ohio Supreme Court December 3, 2013

State ex rel. Ullmann v. JobsOhio, 2013 Ohio 5188 (Ohio 2013)

138 Ohio St. 3d 83; 3 N.E.3d 1183

O'Connor, Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, O'Neill, O'Donnell

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.

{¶ 2} Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to dismiss, it is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss is granted because JobsOhio is specifically exempted from the requirements of R.C. 149.43 by R.C. 187.04(C)(1). Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., not participating.

Reference

Full Case Name: The State Ex Rel. Ullmann v. JobsOhio Et Al.
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published