Mohammad v. State
Mohammad v. State
Opinion
[Cite as Mohammad v. State, 136 Ohio St.3d 326, 2013-Ohio-3669.]
MOHAMMAD, APPELLEE, v. THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT. [Cite as Mohammad v. State, 136 Ohio St.3d 326, 2013-Ohio-3669.] Appellant’s motion to summarily reverse is granted. Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and cause remanded on the authority of Dunbar v. State. (No. 2012-2123—Submitted August 21, 2013—Decided September 5, 2013.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 98655, 2012-Ohio-5517. ____________________ {¶ 1} Appellant’s motion to summarily reverse is granted. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded on the authority of Dunbar v. State, 136 Ohio St.3d 181, 2013-Ohio-2163, 992 N.E.2d 1111. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. ____________________ Terry H. Gilbert, for appellee. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Peter K. Glenn-Applegate, Deputy Solicitor; and Timothy J. McGinty, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Brian R. Gutkoski, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. ________________________
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published