Ohio Supreme Court, 2013

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hartke

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 9, 2013 · O'Connor, Pfeifer, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, O'Neill

2013 Ohio 19; 135 Ohio St. 3d 1227; 985 N.E.2d 505

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Walton (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, James R. Hartke, Attorney Registration No. 0011584, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of June 6, 2012, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.