Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hartke

Ohio Supreme Court
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hartke, 2013 Ohio 19 (Ohio 2013)
135 Ohio St. 3d 1227; 985 N.E.2d 505
O'Connor, Pfeifer, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, O'Neill

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hartke

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, James R. Hartke, Attorney Registration No. 0011584, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of June 6, 2012, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Cincinnati Bar Association v. Hartke
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published