Ohio Supreme Court, 2013

Jarvis v. First Resolution Invest. Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 24, 2013 · Accept, Appeal, French, Lanzinger, Nos, Only, Proposition

135 Ohio St. 3d 1412; 986 N.E.2d 29

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Portfolio Recovery Assocs., L.L.C. v. VanLeeuwen (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
Capital One Bank (USA), NA v. Reese (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Summit App. No. 26042, 2012-Ohio-5653.

O’Connor, C.J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, and IV only.

O’Donnell, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. II and IV only and hold the cause for the decision in 2011-0908, Anderson v. Barclays Capital Real Estate, U.S. Northern District of Ohio, Western Division, Case No. 309CV02335JGC.

French, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, and III only. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.