Ohio Supreme Court, 2013

Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta

Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 8, 2013 · Donnell, French, Pfeifer
135 Ohio St. 3d 1430; 986 N.E.2d 1020
Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Medina App. No. 12CA0025-M, 2012-Ohio-5562. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 1 of the court of appeals’ entry filed January 22, 2013:

“When a defendant fails to appeal from a trial court’s judgment in a foreclosure action, can a lack of standing be raised as part of a motion for relief from judgment?”

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and French, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is PNC Bank, N.A. v. Botts, 10th Dist. No. 12AP-256, 2012-Ohio-5383.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.