State v. Beverly

Ohio Supreme Court November 20, 2013

State v. Beverly, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1414 (Ohio 2013)

998 N.E.2d 512

Connor, Dist, Donnell, French, Grant, Griffin, Hold, Kennedy, Lanzinger, Law, Montgomery, Motion, Nos, Ohio, Pfeifer, Propositions

Opinion of the Court

Clark App. No. 2011 CA 64, 2013-Ohio-1365.

On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted and the discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I only.

Lanzinger, J., concurs and would hold the cause for the decision in case Nos. 2013-1129 and 2013-1319, State v. Griffin, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 24001, 2013-Ohio-2230. O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, J., concur but would grant the motion as to both propositions of *1415law. Pfeifer, Kennedy, and French, JJ., dissent.

Reference

Cited By: 3 cases
Status: Published