Ohio Supreme Court, 2013

State v. Beverly

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 20, 2013 · Connor, Dist, Donnell, French, Grant, Griffin, Hold, Kennedy, Lanzinger, Law, Montgomery, Motion, Nos, Ohio, Pfeifer, Propositions

137 Ohio St. 3d 1414; 998 N.E.2d 512

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Bolton v. Schwigtor (District Court, N.D. Ohio 2021)
State v. Christian (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
State v. White (Ohio Ct. App. 2017)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Clark App. No. 2011 CA 64, 2013-Ohio-1365.

On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted and the discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I only.

Lanzinger, J., concurs and would hold the cause for the decision in case Nos. 2013-1129 and 2013-1319, State v. Griffin, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 24001, 2013-Ohio-2230. O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, J., concur but would grant the motion as to both propositions of *1415law. Pfeifer, Kennedy, and French, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.