Lee v. Cardington

Ohio Supreme Court
Lee v. Cardington, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1440 (Ohio 2013)
999 N.E.2d 695
Connor, Donnell, French, Lanzinger, Law, Neill, Pfeifer, Proposition

Lee v. Cardington

Opinion of the Court

Morrow App. No. 12CA0017, 2013-Ohio-3108. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and French, JJ., would also accept Proposition of Law No. II. O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary cross-appeal not accepted.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer and French, JJ., dissent.

Reference

Status
Published