Ohio Supreme Court, 2013

Lee v. Cardington

Lee v. Cardington
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 24, 2013 · Connor, Donnell, French, Lanzinger, Law, Neill, Pfeifer, Proposition
137 Ohio St. 3d 1440; 999 N.E.2d 695

Lee v. Cardington

Opinion of the Court

Morrow App. No. 12CA0017, 2013-Ohio-3108. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and French, JJ., would also accept Proposition of Law No. II. O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary cross-appeal not accepted.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer and French, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.