Ohio Supreme Court, 2014

Jelinek v. Abbott Laboratories

Jelinek v. Abbott Laboratories
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 17, 2014
139 Ohio St. 3d 1422; 10 N.E.3d 741

Jelinek v. Abbott Laboratories

Opinion of the Court

Franklin App. No. 11AP-996, 2013-Ohio-1675. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of the renewed motions for admission pro hac vice of James F. Hurst, Derek J. Sarafa, Steffen N. Johnson, and Samantha L.Maxfield, it is ordered by the court that the motions are granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file notices of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.