Ohio Supreme Court, 2014

State ex rel. Rohrer v. Holzapfel

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 23, 2014 · Connor, Donnell, French, Grant, Kennedy, Lanzinger, Neill, Pfeifer, Writ

139 Ohio St. 3d 1481; 12 N.E.3d 1227

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Rohrer (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On consideration of answers of respondents Jane Krason and Hon. Leonard Holzapfel and motions for judgment on the pleadings of Jane Krason and Hon. Leonard Holzapfel. Motions for judgment on the pleadings granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.