Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2014

State ex rel. Rohrer v. Holzapfel

State ex rel. Rohrer v. Holzapfel
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 23, 2014 · Connor, Donnell, French, Grant, Kennedy, Lanzinger, Neill, Pfeifer, Writ
139 Ohio St. 3d 1481; 12 N.E.3d 1227

State ex rel. Rohrer v. Holzapfel

Opinion of the Court

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On consideration of answers of respondents Jane Krason and Hon. Leonard Holzapfel and motions for judgment on the pleadings of Jane Krason and Hon. Leonard Holzapfel. Motions for judgment on the pleadings granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑