State v. Martin
State v. Martin
141 Ohio St. 3d 1452; 23 N.E.3d 1194
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- State v. Magnone (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Montgomery App. No. 26033, 2014-OMÓ-3640. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 6 of the court of appeals’ entry filed November 6, 2014:
“With respect to R.C. 2907.323(A)(1), which proscribes the creation or production of nudity-oriented material involving a minor, which definition of nudity applies: the statutory definition (R.C. 2907.01(H)), or the narrower definition set forth in State v. Young, 37 Ohio St.3d 249, 525 N.E.2d 1363, which requires additional elements of ‘lewd depiction’ and ‘graphic focus on the genitals?’”
The conflict case is State v. Graves, 184 Ohio App.3d 39, 2009-Ohio-974, 919 N.E.2d 753.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.