State v. Marcum
Cases that cite this one
18 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Gwynne (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2019)
- State v. Johnson (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
- State v. Jackson (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
- State v. Hill (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
- State v. Morrow (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
- State v. Shoemaker (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
- State v. Clinkscale (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
- State v. Mavroudis (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
- State v. Elmore (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
- State v. Adams (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
- State v. Adams (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
- State v. McCabe-Heathcote (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
- State v. Hart (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
- State v. Shinn (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
- State v. McGowan (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
- State v. Howell (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
- State v. Endrizzi (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
- State v. Williams (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Gallia App. No. 13CA11, 2014-0hio-4048. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ entry filed December 5, 2014:
“[D]oes the test outlined by the [e]ourt in State v. Kalish apply in reviewing felony sentences after the passage of R.C. 2953.08(G)?”
The conflict cases are State v. Hill, 7th Dist. Carroll No. 13CA892, 2014-Ohio-1965, and State v. Simmons, 9th Dist. Summit No. 27197, 2014-Ohio-4191.
Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2014-1825, State v. Marcum, 4th Dist. Gallia No. 13CA11, 2014-Ohio-4048.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.