Ohio Supreme Court, 2016

Disciplinary Counsel v. Ward

Disciplinary Counsel v. Ward
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 29, 2016 · French, Kennedy, Lanzinger, O'ConnoR, O'Donnell, O'Neill, PfeifeR
2016 Ohio 734; 146 Ohio St. 3d 1254; 55 N.E.3d 1117

Disciplinary Counsel v. Ward

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Richard Grove Ward, Attorney Registration No. 0037613, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio.

*1255 {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of January 29, 2015, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the ■ practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

O’ConnoR, C.J., and PfeifeR, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, FRENCH, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.