Disciplinary Counsel v. Bunstine

Ohio Supreme Court
Disciplinary Counsel v. Bunstine, 2016 Ohio 2735 (Ohio 2016)
146 Ohio St. 3d 1229; 52 N.E.3d 1194
O'Connor, Pfeifer, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, O'Neill

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bunstine

Opinion

{¶ 1} These causes came on for further consideration upon the filing of applications for reinstatement by respondent, Edward Royal Bunstine, Attorney Registration No. 0030127, last known business address in Chillicothe, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 28, 2013, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year with six months stayed on condition, and its order of September 16, 2015, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with those orders and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

*1230 {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Reference

Status
Published