Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

In Re A.W.

Ohio Supreme Court
In Re A.W., 2016 Ohio 5455 (Ohio 2016)
147 Ohio St. 3d 110; 60 N.E.3d 1264
O'Connor, O'Donnell, Kennedy, French, Pfeifer, Lanzinger, O'Neill

In Re A.W.

Opinion

(¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed as to the holdings regarding double jeopardy and' due process on the authority of In re D.S., 146 Ohio St.3d 182, 2016-Ohio-1027, 54 N.E.3d 1184.

{¶ 2} The remainder of the appeal is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and O’Neill, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in In re D.S. and would order briefing on the issues raised in the remainder of the appeal. *111 Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Charlyn Bohland, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, A.W.

Reference

Full Case Name
In Re A.W. (Slip Opinion)
Status
Published
↑