Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2016

In Re A.W.

In Re A.W.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 23, 2016 · O'Connor, O'Donnell, Kennedy, French, Pfeifer, Lanzinger, O'Neill
2016 Ohio 5455; 147 Ohio St. 3d 110; 60 N.E.3d 1264

In Re A.W.

Opinion

(¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed as to the holdings regarding double jeopardy and' due process on the authority of In re D.S., 146 Ohio St.3d 182, 2016-Ohio-1027, 54 N.E.3d 1184.

{¶ 2} The remainder of the appeal is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and O’Neill, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in In re D.S. and would order briefing on the issues raised in the remainder of the appeal. *111 Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Charlyn Bohland, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, A.W.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑