Ohio Supreme Court, 2016

State v. Cornelison

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 17, 2016 · Connor, Donnell, French, Kennedy, Lanzinger, Neill, Pfeifer

146 Ohio St. 3d 220; 2016 Ohio 2968; 54 N.E.3d 1217

Cases that cite this one

14 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Cornelison (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2016)
State v. Richardson (Ohio Ct. App. 2017)
State v. Cornelison (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
State v. Hiles (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)
State v. Newman (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)
State v. Murphy (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
State v. Manon (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
State v. Ervin (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
State v. Moore (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
State v. Rucker (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
State v. Jones (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
State v. Malenda (Ohio Ct. App. 2017)
State v. Kuykendall (Ohio Ct. App. 2017)
State v. Harding (Ohio Ct. App. 2017)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} In State v. Marcum, 146 Ohio St.3d 516, 2016-Ohio-1002, 59 N.E.3d 1231, we held that R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) allows an appellate court to increase, reduce, or otherwise modify a sentence only when it clearly and convincingly finds that the sentence is (1) contrary to law or (2) unsupported by the record. Id. at ¶ 7.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals in the instant case is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of Marcum.

O’Connor, C.J., and PfeifeR, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.