Ohio Supreme Court, 2016

State v. Overholser

State v. Overholser
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 17, 2016 · Accepted, Appeal, Connor, Dismiss, Donnell, French, Kennedy, Lanzinger, Neill, Pfeifer
147 Ohio St. 3d 165; 62 N.E.3d 178

State v. Overholser

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Marcum, 146 Ohio St.3d 516, 2016-Ohio-1002, 59 N.E.3d 1231.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Lanzinger and Kennedy, JJ., dissent and would dismiss the appeal as having been improvidently accepted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.