State v. McGowan
Cases that cite this one
31 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- State v. Eitzman (Ohio Ct. App. 2022)
- State v. Wilson (Ohio Ct. App. 2022)
- State v. Jendrusik (Ohio Ct. App. 2022)
- State v. Purvis (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)
- State v. Risner (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)
- State v. Berry (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)
- State v. Silvas (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)
- State v. Graham (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
- State v. Rodgers (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
- State v. Walker (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
- State v. Whitaker (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
- State v. Ford (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
- State v. Jones (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
- State v. Jung (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
- State v. Walton (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
- State v. Cencebaugh (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
- State v. Ware (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
- State v. Jones (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
- State v. Hull (Ohio Ct. App. 2017)
- State v. Cochran (Ohio Ct. App. 2017)
- State v. Malenda (Ohio Ct. App. 2017)
- State v. Witt (Ohio Ct. App. 2017)
- State v. Whatley (Ohio Ct. App. 2017)
- State v. Ford (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
- State v. King (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 1} In State v. Marcum, 146 Ohio St.3d 516, 2016-Ohio-1002, 59 N.E.3d 1231, we held that R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) allows an appellate court to increase, reduce, or otherwise modify a sentence only when it clearly and convincingly finds that the sentence is (1) contrary to law and/or (2) unsupported by the record. Id. at ¶ 7.
{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals in the instant case is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of Marcum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.