Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

State v. Wimbush

Ohio Supreme Court
State v. Wimbush, 147 Ohio St. 3d 250 (Ohio 2016)
63 N.E.3d 1180
Connor, Donnell, French, Kennedy, Lanzinger, Neill, Pfeifer

State v. Wimbush

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with our decision in State v. Heinz, 146 Ohio St.3d 374, 2016-Ohio-2814, 56 N.E.3d 965.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Timothy J. McGinty, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and T. Allan Regas and Frank Romeo Zeleznikar, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State of Ohio v. Wimbush
Status
Published
↑