In re R.A.H.

Ohio Supreme Court November 3, 2016

In re R.A.H., 148 Ohio St. 3d 531 (Ohio 2016)

2016 Ohio 7592; 71 N.E.3d 1015

Connor, Donnell, French, Kennedy, Lanzinger, Neill, Pfeifer, Re, Stated, Would

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals as to proposition of law No. I is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals to apply In re A.G., 148 Ohio St.3d 118, 2016-Ohio-3306, 69 N.E.3d 646.

{¶2} Proposition of law No. II is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., dissent and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in In re AG.

Reference

Cited By: 3 cases
Status: Published