Ohio Supreme Court, 2016

In re R.A.H.

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 3, 2016 · Connor, Donnell, French, Kennedy, Lanzinger, Neill, Pfeifer, Re, Stated, Would

148 Ohio St. 3d 531; 2016 Ohio 7592; 71 N.E.3d 1015

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

In re R.A.H. (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2016)
In re D.F. (Ohio Ct. App. 2022)
In re D.R. (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals as to proposition of law No. I is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals to apply In re A.G., 148 Ohio St.3d 118, 2016-Ohio-3306, 69 N.E.3d 646.

{¶2} Proposition of law No. II is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., dissent and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in In re AG.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.